Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Persistent Systems (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for US buyers who need hardware-adjacent engineering depth and are fine with an EU-based team. Persistent Systems is the stronger option for US software companies wanting product-engineering depth over generalist IT services. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1990 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pune, India |
| Team size | 200+ | 23,900+ |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe | A software-product-engineering specialization rather than a broad IT-services generalist offering |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models, tech consulting, team extension or staff augmentation, and full-scope product development from concept through delivery, scoped to the client's actual need rather than a fixed package | Dedicated product teams and fixed-scope engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | SaaS, Healthcare, Financial services, Technology |
Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv, Ukraine in 2007 and has grown to a team of 200+ engineers, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; and Kraków, Poland. It has no physical US location, which matters for a site built around a US buyer, so it's worth stating up front rather than burying it: this is a European delivery team, full stop. What it brings instead is depth most generalist outsourcing vendors on this list don't staff for, embedded systems, firmware, electrical engineering, and connectivity work, wrapped in a broader cloud, data, and AI practice. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification alongside direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
Persistent Systems
Persistent Systems was founded in 1990 and is headquartered in Pune, India, with roughly 23,900 employees, a fraction of the size of Infosys or TCS, but with a more concentrated focus on software product engineering rather than broad-spectrum IT services. It works extensively with independent software vendors and technology companies building the actual product a US buyer sells, work that sits closer to the product itself than the back-office IT operations most of its peers focus on. That focus makes it a more natural fit for a software company specifically, compared to the sprawling generalist practice of a much larger Indian peer.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| IT consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff aug / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | SaaS, Healthcare, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team., An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure over-the-air firmware updates. | A US software company or ISV wanting an outsourcing partner focused specifically on product engineering., A mid-size modernization program that benefits from closer account attention than a mega-vendor typically provides. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Real embedded, firmware, and electrical engineering depth most of the general-purpose vendors on this list simply don't have on staff. |
| + | One vendor covers hardware, firmware, cloud, and AI instead of a US buyer stitching together three separate contracts. |
| + | The Hamburg and London offices put a meaningful chunk of the team within a workable overlap of US East Coast mornings, better than a delivery center on the other side of the Pacific. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification plus healthcare-specific delivery under IEC 62304 and FDA 21 CFR Part 820. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer on every engagement. |
| - | No US legal entity or physical office, so a buyer who needs a domestic contracting party for procurement or insurance reasons should factor that in before signing |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, only development and ongoing maintenance |
| - | Not the right fit for a buyer who just wants a plain web or mobile app with no hardware or deep-technical component involved |
| Persistent Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Focused specifically on software product engineering, a better fit for an actual tech company than a generalist IT-services vendor. |
| + | Meaningfully smaller than TCS or Infosys, so it can offer closer account attention at real enterprise scale. |
| + | Strong track record partnering with independent software vendors specifically, a different client base than the enterprise back-office accounts most peers chase. |
| + | Publicly traded with financial disclosure, giving procurement a verifiable track record. |
| - | Smaller total capacity than the largest Indian majors, so it's a weaker fit for an extremely large, multi-thousand-person program |
| - | Most delivery remains India-based, with limited domestic US presence compared to a firm like Infosys or Cognizant |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team.
Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose Persistent Systems?
A typical fit: a US software company or ISV wanting an outsourcing partner focused specifically on product engineering.
A software-product-engineering specialization rather than a broad IT-services generalist offering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in SaaS, Healthcare, Financial services, Technology.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Persistent Systems (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Persistent Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure over-the-air firmware updates. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A US software company or ISV wanting an outsourcing partner focused specifically on product engineering. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A mid-size modernization program that benefits from closer account attention than a mega-vendor typically provides. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (USA) projects. Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe.
Persistent Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a mid-size modernization program that benefits from closer account attention than a mega-vendor typically provides. If your situation matches that, Persistent Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Persistent Systems FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Persistent Systems?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: real embedded, firmware, and electrical engineering depth most of the general-purpose vendors on this list simply don't have on staff. Persistent Systems's strongest advantage: focused specifically on software product engineering, a better fit for an actual tech company than a generalist IT-services vendor.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Persistent Systems differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models, tech consulting, team extension or staff augmentation, and full-scope product development from concept through delivery, scoped to the client's actual need rather than a fixed package pricing. Persistent Systems uses dedicated product teams and fixed-scope engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Persistent Systems?
Persistent Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Persistent Systems?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe. Persistent Systems's primary differentiator is: a software-product-engineering specialization rather than a broad IT-services generalist offering. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 23,900+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs SaaS, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.